Fact Sheet

PFAS and Firefighters: A short overview

Firefighters

Studies show that firefighters have higher rates of cancer compared to the general population (1). To protect their health, it’s important to understand how on-the-job exposures to toxic chemicals may increase their cancer risk. Firefighters are exposed to a variety of cancer-causing chemicals released from burning materials during a fire. Firefighting equipment and gear also contain harmful chemicals, including a class of chemicals called PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). Occupational exposures to PFAS are of particular concern because some PFAS have been linked to harmful health effects. These include cancers (such as testicular and kidney), high cholesterol, preeclampsia, liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased response to vaccines, infertility, and developmental problems, including low birth weight. What’s more, PFAS don’t break down and some can remain in the body for years. Unfortunately, firefighters have been exposed to toxic PFAS without their knowledge for decades.

What do studies of PFAS in the blood of firefighters tell us?

Multiple studies have found that firefighters have elevated levels of PFAS in their blood (2-8). In particular, firefighters who repeatedly use Class B aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in fire emergencies and training exercises have higher levels of PFAS in their blood compared to the general population (6, 8-10). Other notable findings include:

How are firefighters exposed?

Certain firefighting foams, turnout gear, and fire station dust are common sources of PFAS exposure to firefighters.

Firefighting foam

Some manufacturers add PFAS to AFFF, which is used to fight fuel fires. Older formulations of AFFF contained long-chain PFAS, such as PFOS and PFOA. These PFAS are no longer manufactured in the U.S. due to their toxicity. Newer formulations of AFFF contain newer types of PFAS, including short-chain PFAS, which are also persistent. Firefighters can be exposed to PFAS from droplets of AFFF in the air during firefighting activities, from direct skin contact with AFFF, and from drinking AFFF-contaminated water, particularly when these foams are used close to drinking water wells serving fire stations (9, 13).

Turnout Gear

Turnout gear is multilayered clothing designed to protect firefighters. Manufacturers add fluoropolymers—a PFAS used in Teflon-based products—to layers of turnout gear to make it water resistant and compliant with industry standards. One of these standards, the National Firefighter Protection Association’s Standard 1971, requires that the moisture barrier of turnout gear be able to withstand UV light degradation, even though this layer is not exposed to light (14, 15). Currently only fluoropolymers can meet this standard. Firefighter advocates view this standard as non-essential and are advocating for PFAS-free turnout gear.

Studies reveal that the highest levels of PFAS in turnout gear are in the outer shell and moisture barrier (16, 17). Some PFAS were also found in the innermost thermal liner, which is concerning because PFAS are not intentionally added to this layer. This suggests that PFAS migrate to the thermal layer and can come in direct contact with the skin. PFAS can also accumulate on the surfaces of turnout gear from AFFF as well as from smoke and soot containing PFAS. When PFAS in furnishings and other items (such as stain-resistant carpeting and upholstery) burn during a fire, they can end up in the smoke and collect on firefighters’ turnout gear.

Fire station dust

Several studies have found elevated levels of certain PFAS in dust samples from fire stations. For instance, a study of fire stations in the U.S. and Canada found dust levels of 4 long-chain PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA) were higher in fire stations than in people’s homes (18). Another study of fire stations in Massachusetts found higher dust levels of PFAS in turnout gear storage rooms compared with fire station living rooms (17).

What’s being done to protect firefighters?

Based on the available science so far, removing PFAS from Class B foams and from turnout gear would greatly limit firefighters’ exposures to PFAS. Manufacturers are searching for, developing, and selling alternatives to PFAS in foams and gear. Some laws have been passed to restrict AFFF use and disclose PFAS in firefighting materials. In 2018, Washington became the first state to require purchasers to be notified if their personal protective equipment (PPE) for firefighters contains PFAS and the purpose of adding PFAS to these products (19). A similar law in California took effect in January 2022 (20).

There are also many large-scale studies to monitor firefighters’ exposures and health. At the national level, the 2018 Firefighter Cancer Registry Act established a voluntary registry of firefighters to collect information about cancer incidences, including firefighters from under-represented groups such as women and minorities (21). In 2021, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services launched a biomonitoring program called PFAS in Firefighters of Michigan Surveillance to study PFAS exposures among firefighters (22).

How can firefighters reduce their exposures to PFAS?

References

References

1. Soteriades ES, Kim J, Christophi CA, et al. Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Firefighters: A State-of-the-Art Review and Meta-َAnalysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2019;20(11):3221-31. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3221

2. Shaw SD, Berger ML, Harris JH, et al. Persistent organic pollutants including polychlorinated and polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in firefighters from Northern California. Chemosphere 2013;91(10):1386-94. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.070

3. Bluteau T, Cornelsen M, Day G, et al. The Global PFAS Problem: Fluorine-Free Alternatives as Solutions – Has Time Run out for Short-Chain Replacements for C8 PFAS? Geneva: IPEN, 2019.

4. Jin C, Sun Y, Islam A, et al. Perfluoroalkyl Acids Including Perfluorooctane Sulfonate and Perfluorohexane Sulfonate in Firefighters. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2011;53(3):324. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31820d1314

5. Dobraca D, Israel L, McNeel S, et al. Biomonitoring in California firefighters: metals and perfluorinated chemicals. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2015;57(1):88-97. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000307

6. Leary DB, Takazawa M Fau – Kannan K, Kannan K Fau – Khalil N, et al. Perfluoroalkyl Substances and Metabolic Syndrome in Firefighters: A Pilot Study. J Occup Environ Med 2020(1536-5948 (Electronic)) doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001756

7. Laitinen JA, Koponen J, Koikkalainen J, et al. Firefighters’ exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids and 2-butoxyethanol present in firefighting foams. Toxicol Lett 2014;231(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.09.007

8. Levasseur JL, Hoffman K, Herkert NJ, et al. Characterizing firefighter’s exposure to over 130 SVOCs using silicone wristbands: A pilot study comparing on-duty and off-duty exposures. Science of The Total Environment 2022;834:155237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155237

9. Rotander A, Toms LM, Aylward L, et al. Elevated levels of PFOS and PFHxS in firefighters exposed to aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). Environ Int 2015;82:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.05.005 [published Online First: 2015/05/24]

10. Trowbridge J, Gerona RR, Lin T, et al. Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances in a Cohort of Women Firefighters and Office Workers in San Francisco. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54(6):3363-74. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05490

11. Tao L, Kannan K, Aldous KM, et al. Biomonitoring of Perfluorochemicals in Plasma of New York State Personnel Responding to the World Trade Center Disaster. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42(9):3472-78. doi: 10.1021/es8000079

12. Graber JM, Black TM, Shah NN, et al. Prevalence and Predictors of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Serum Levels among Members of a Suburban US Volunteer Fire Department. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(7):3730. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073730

13. De Silva AO, Armitage JM, Bruton TA, et al. PFAS Exposure Pathways for Humans and Wildlife: A Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Key Gaps in Understanding. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2021;40(3):631-57. doi: 10.1002/etc.4935

14. Freedom to Choose. Freedom to Choose: PFAS-Free PPE. Freedom to Choose: PFAS-Free PPE n.d.

15. National Fire Protection A. NFPA 1971: Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting. Quincy, MA 2018.

16. Muensterman DJ, Titaley IA, Peaslee GF, et al. Disposition of Fluorine on New Firefighter Turnout Gear. Environ Sci Technol 2022;56(2):974-83. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06322

17. Young AS, Sparer-Fine EH, Pickard HM, et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and total fluorine in fire station dust. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2021;31(5):930-42. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00288-7

18. Hall SM, Patton S, Petreas M, et al. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Dust Collected from Residential Homes and Fire Stations in North America. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54(22):14558-67. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04869

19. State of Washington DoE. Toxics in firefighting law – Washington State Department of Ecology. 2021

20. SB-1044: Firefightering Equipment and Foam: PFAS Chemicals, 2020.

21. Firefighter Cancer Registry Act of 2018. 42 USC § 280e-05, 2018.

22. Michigan Department of Health. PFAS in Firefighters of Michigan Surveillance (PFOMS). 2021

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.